Myth: university student and staff wellbeing cannot be measured

Asset 5@2x
Insights.
Wellbeing advocates often struggle to secure appropriate funding for their university wellbeing initiatives. Many times this is because their business cases focus on qualitative rather than quantitative data. This presents a mismatch with budget holders who prefer quantifiable metrics – to satisfy their due diligence, allay their sense of risk, and promote accountability of results.

What the evidence says

The good news is that there is widespread acceptance that wellbeing can be measured, albeit a lack of consensus# on a common measurement standard.

There have been at least 30 formal measures of wellbeing developed over the past 50 years, using different definitions and applied to the organisational context. It is not necessary to adopt an existing formal measure, but a university may find it useful to review existing measures when articulating the metrics that will be relevant to their specific institution.

References: Download report to access full reference list.

Workplaces are complex ecosystems

How to measure university wellbeing

Unlike sales and expense figures, wellbeing metrics do not fit naturally on a balance sheet. Similar to staff performance metrics, wellbeing metrics need work done behind the scenes to define what is being measured, when, how, and why. This upfront effort, together with a concern about choosing the wrong metrics, can deter universities from starting their journey.

However, it’s important to remember that wellbeing metrics will evolve over time, based on: a maturing definition of wellbeing; best practices in the sector; and each institution’s learnings. The necessity to start, learn, and pivot should trump the requirement for perfectionism at commencement.

Wellbeing metrics for universities

The measurement of student and staff wellbeing typically involves a combination of leading and lagging indicators, as per the examples that follow:

Leading indicators

Leading indicators (“inputs”) help predict future outcomes and events. They “look forward through the windshield at the road ahead”. Examples include:

Examples include:

  • High-level support
    • Leadership buy-in (as rated by students and staff)
      • Leaders ‘walk the talk’ about healthy university practices
      • Leaders talk about their mental health and wellbeing
      • Leaders encourage discussion of student and staff wellbeing
      • Leaders commit to best practice in wellbeing
    • Funding
      • Amount budgeted for student and staff wellbeing
      • Staff time allocated to wellbeing management
    • Policies and processes (existence and quality)
      • Safety and wellbeing policies
      • Flexible and remote work policies
      • Leave policies
      • Diversity, equity, and inclusion policies
      • Bullying and harassment policies
      • Clear and effective change management processes
      • Regular insights gathered
      • Formal feedback loops in place
  • Scope
    • Physical health and safety
    • Job design
      • The level of personal control, autonomy, and decision-making
      • The level of colleague, team, and management support for tasks assigned
  • Programs and initiatives
    • Professional development opportunities
    • Wellbeing programs and initiatives. Examples might include:
      • Gym benefits
      • Safety services
      • Social activities
      • Sleep programs
      • Health programs
      • Financial support
      • Exercise programs
      • Health assessments
      • Telehealth programs
      • Mental health support
      • Career support programs
      • Health insurance or benefits
      • Onsite or offsite vaccinations
  • Awareness
    • Amount of visible health-promoting collateral
    • Number and reach of wellbeing information sessions
    • Number of ‘speak up’ programs and champions
    • Portion aware of the different wellbeing initiatives
    • Portion who understand each wellbeing initiative
  • Training
    • First aid (and mental health first aid) training
    • Resilience training
    • Compassion training
    • Workplace Health and Safety (WHS) training
    • Diversity, equity, and inclusion training
  • Participation and engagement
    • Reach of programs and initiatives
    • Participation and uptake rates
    • Engagement with wellbeing resources
    • Health behaviours (e.g. the number who are meeting the daily physical activity and alcohol consumption recommendations, as well as the number who are smoke-free)
  • Satisfaction
    • Focus groups
    • Satisfaction and engagement surveys
    • Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS)
    • QILT Student Experience Survey (SES)

Disclaimer: List is suggestive, not exhaustive.

References: Download report to access full reference list.

Lagging indicators

Lagging indicators (“outputs”) show tangible results. They “look backwards through the rear window at the road already travelled”.

Examples include:

  • Health
    • Prevalence of health conditions
    • Student support program usage
    • Staff support program (e.g. EAP) usage
    • Number of referrals to other third parties for help
  • Claims and premiums
    • Health insurance claims
    • Workers’ compensation claims
    • Health care spend (including premiums)
  • Work time
    • Annual leave usage rates
    • Sickness and absenteeism rates
    • Lost time injury frequency rates (LTIFR)
    • Lost work days to institutional factors
    • Return to work rates
  • Legal and compliance
    • Recommended actions from WHS audits
    • Workplace investigations
    • Workplace litigations
  • Attrition
    • Peer reviews and 360-degree feedback
    • Voluntary staff attrition rates
    • Early student departure rates
    • Exit survey information

Disclaimer: List is suggestive, not exhaustive.

References: Download report to access full reference list.

The dilemma of choice

Over the years, wellbeing offerings for students and staff have evolved into a smorgasbord of choice. Whilst this represents positive progress, it has also created:

  • A complex landscape for students and staff to navigate
    • Unless they have a single point of entry to their university’s wellbeing service offerings; and
  • A daunting requirement for wellbeing leaders to provide whole-of-business insights
    • Unless their wellbeing offerings are integrated and actively capturing meaningful data on all of their initiatives.

Next steps

As evidenced above, the wellbeing of students and staff can be measured, which is great news for wellbeing advocates who struggle to secure appropriate funding for their wellbeing initiatives due to lack of qualitative and/or quantitative data.

Similar to many other strategies and programs, the secret to impactful measurement is to take action now and evolve – not wait for next semester, next year, or for the stars to align.

Want to learn more?

To read the other four myths about student and staff wellbeing, we invite you to download our evidence-based report, 5 myths about student and staff wellbeing.

For more information about how Sonder can help you rethink your university’s student and staff wellbeing strategies, we invite you to contact us here.


About Sonder

Sonder is a leading Australian wellbeing and safety company accredited by the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS). Our solution is a technology-driven platform supported by 24/7 safety, medical, and mental health experts. This is backed up by a physical responder network that can be onsite quickly for complex scenarios, plus a capability to deliver unique and timely data insights which drive meaningful business decisions.

Related posts

Are Australian universities keeping up with the changing needs of international students?

Are universities keeping up with the changing needs of international students?

Today is International Students’ Day – a day of international observance of the student community and a celebration of the multiculturalism of international students. It’s a day to appreciate what the international student community brings to their host nations, as…

Continue
2021 results regarding the learning experience for international and domestic students in Australia.

QILT SES results: the challenge of low learner engagement, and the importance of personal safety

The latest QILT Student Experience Survey (SES) results brought both positive and negative news for the Australian tertiary education sector. On the positive side, the university student experience in Australia has started to improve. On the not-so-positive side, more work…

Continue
Psychological debriefing is not current best practice for university students and staff.

Myth: university students and staff need psychological debriefing after traumatic events

For years, support programs have prescribed the urgent deployment of a psychologist or trauma counsellor to the scene of a critical incident or traumatic event. As a result, well-intentioned universities keen to exercise their duty of care have traditionally agreed…

Continue

There's so much more to share

Sonder is reimagining health, safety and wellbeing support. Sonder proves human centric care leads to earlier intervention. Sonder impacts one person at a time to drive meaningful change across an organisation. Sonder understands people and how to support them.

iPhone app mockups_About Us